Many kinds of events draw crowds. From sports to musical performances, people enjoy gathering together when something exciting is taking
place. This is especially true when a decision is involved. Think of the all the
shows on TV that involve some kind of competition that comes down the decision
of a judge or the audience. Think of the millions who stay up late into the
night to watch election results or the finale of the Bachelor. We are people who collect themselves in
groups. Such is the case in our next stop in the journey to Bethlehem.
Interestingly, this stop has us in Bethlehem, only a few centuries prior to the
events of that first Christmas morning. You see, there was a family who
happened upon hard times in Bethlehem during a famine. This family packed their
things and headed to Moab where they had better luck, at least for a while. The
sons of the house married women from this region and all was working as best as
could be expected when the father of the house and his two sons died. This left
an aging Naomi, Orpah, and Ruth without husbands or sons and in dire straits. With no
way to provide for themselves and no ability to continue the family name, Naomi
decides to head back home to Bethlehem. Against her wishes, at first, Ruth accompanies
her and the two of them try to pick of the pieces of their lives as best they
can and start over. No husband, no prospects, no means of feeding themselves.
Starting over would be a tall order.
Tragedy turns into a love story when Ruth “happens” to find
herself gleaning in a field for scraps of food. The field, by the way, just “happens”
to be owned by a potential suitor—a man by the name of Boaz—who just so “happens”
to be a potential “kinsmen.” You see, when a man died and left a widow, it was
up to the man’s brother or close male relative to marry the widow, provide for
her well-being, and produce an heir that would inherit what originally belonged
to the deceased. After Ruth’s gleaning and some very generous gestures extended
by Boaz, Ruth returns home to Naomi encouraged.
Naomi finds out about all of this, realizes the possibilities
before Ruth (and her) and goes from mourning to matchmaker. She hatches a
late-night proposal in which Ruth would approach Boaz, reveal who she is, and,
in no uncertain terms, let it be known that she is available and in need of a
kinsmen to come to her rescue. The plan works and Boaz agrees to step in for
her and Naomi—it seems he has taken a liking to this Moabite women gleaning in
his field.
However, as with any good love story, there is a slight
hitch. There is a nearer kinsmen that really has first rights to Ruth (sorry
ladies, this is how it worked in the ancient world). So insignificant is this
other guys that the Bible doesn’t even name him (it actually in a round-about
way refers to him as Mr. So-and-so). By now Ruth and Boaz are an item, would
this Mr. So-and-so stand in their way? Boaz was determined to find out and has
a meeting with the guy the very next day.
After exchanging pleasantries, Boaz lays it all on the table
and asks to take the man’s place as Ruth’s kinsman and redeem her out of her desperate
plight. This is where we enter the story. By now, the gossip has hit the small
town, people know about the budding romance and all of the important
implications thereof, and a crowd has gathered in an effort to hear the
decision that was made between Boaz and Mr. So-and-So. Interested in the
outcome of this decision, the group has grown to many onlookers who, in their
passing by, have decided to tune in and hear the result of the decision that
has been made between these two men. Let us take our place among them and
examine three results of the decision made between the two and how it foreshadows
the greatest ever kinsmen redeemer—Christ—who comes to purchase lost sinners
out of their desperate plight.
a. RESULT #1: The
Practice of the Custom-4:7-8
Verses 7-8 interrupt the meeting that is taking place and
draw attention to the gestures that would have accompanied the decision that
was made earlier (cf. 4:6)—“Now this was the custom in former times in Israel
concerning the redemptions and the exchange of land to confirm any matter: a
man removed his sandal and gave it to another and this was the manner of
attestation in Israel” (4:7). The removal of a sandal in ancient customs was a
symbolic act declaring his abdication of his own rights as the redeemer and
their transfer to the next in line. In those days, the sandal was the most
common form of footwear, generally made of leather and fastened with straps or
laces. The act of removing the sandal and handing to another was symbolic of an
exchange or transfer of goods or rights. The purpose of this legal gesture is
defined with two expressions, “to put any matter into effect,” (translated,
“confirm any matter”) that is to make legally binding, and “now this is/was the
form of attestation/legalization in Israel,” that is to bear witness. Inasmuch
as a transfer was made and inasmuch as this transfer was made among a crowd of
witnesses, this seems to describe what this gesture meant in this context.
Therefore, the act makes concrete the transfer of rights from one person to the
next. The transfer of the sandal would have been more meaningful in that
culture than it would be today. Sandals were important footwear and many did
not have but one pair. To give up a sandal meant giving up half of your closet footwear,
leaving you barefoot on one foot until you could acquire another. Not only was
this personally taxing, it would have been publicly observed. Anyone, for the
remainder of that day at least would have been able to see Mr. So-and-so
wearing only one sandal or carrying only one in his hand and would have been
able to understand that a legally binding deal had been made.
This gesture was accompanied by a verbal declaration
“Acquire for yourself” (4:8-a recapitulation of the statement made in verse 6).
With the transfer of the sandal as the final legal gesture, the official court
proceedings were complete. The rights and responsibilities of redemption
(concerning the deceased estate) had been officially transferred to Boaz, and
he was legally recognized as the redeemer. While Boaz grows more important to
us in the story with this new distinction, Mr. So-and-so, disappears from the
scene almost as quickly as he appeared, heading home to live an unchanged and
normal life.
b. RESULT #2: The
Proclamation of the Conclusion-4:9-10
With a bit more pep in his step than earlier, Boaz closes
the meeting with a passionate speech. This speech defines the significance of
what just took place for everyone around him and calls attention to what they
observed. Although originally Boaz called just ten elders around to bear
witness, since the meeting began, many walking through the city gates had
remained to watch as the business was conducted. This is why the author says,
“to the elders and all the people, ‘You are witnesses today that I have bought
from the hand of Naomi all that belonged to Elimelech and all that belonged to
Chilion and Mahlon…” (4:9).
Boaz’s concluding speech begins and ends with the same
clause, “your are witnesses.” With this declaration, Boaz affirms that if ever
in the future there would be any question of what had transpired between him
and so-and-so, many would be able to remember what had happened and bear
witness. With this in mind, Boaz summarizes two actions that had transpired.
The first being the transfer of the estate of Elimelech. He had obtained the
right to purchase it from whomever held it presently. In so doing, he would
restore the land back to whom it originally belonged.
In the second portion of his summary, Boaz declared that he
had also acquired the rights of Ruth—“moreover, I have acquired Ruth the
Moabitess, the widow of Maholon, to be my wife” (4:10a). He mentions the land
first because his right to Ruth was contingent upon gaining the right to the
property. However, it is obvious from the construction of the sentence that
Ruth was his primary goal. Literally, it reads, “and also Ruth, the Moabitess,
the wife of Mahlon, I have acquired for myself.” From this clear reference, it
is obvious that Ruth’s foreign status was no barrier for Boaz. Instead, it almost
appears as though, because of her glowing reputation throughout Bethlehem, he
relishes the idea of marrying this foreigner.
This is not unlike Christ’s redemption for the believer.
Although foreigners to His kingdom because of our sin, Jesus is pleased, if
not, proud, that He is able to Redeem those of the world. He has the rights to
do so and is absolutely willing.
The remainder of Boaz’s speech explains the reason and
motivation behind the preceding meeting. Again, it is obvious that although the
estate made up the majority of the deal, Boaz’s primary consideration was for
Ruth. The addition of “for my wife” creates the initial impression that his
motives are purely personal. However, what he reveals next is that so much more
is going on here—God is up to something bigger.
“In order to raise up the name of the deceased on his
inheritance, so that the name of the deceased will not be cut off from his
brothers or from the court of his birth place;
you are witnesses today’…” (4:10b). In Boaz’s explanation of his motivation in
the foregoing legal efforts he used three significant expressions. His first
goal was to establish the name of the deceased on through his own inheritance.
Boaz’s second goal was to prevent the name of the deceased from being “cut off
from his brothers.” This expression represents one of several for annihilating
one’s honor and reputation and preventing one’s post-death existence. Boaz’s
third goal is to prevent his name from being cut off from “the court of his birth place.” This decision by Boaz is
intended to guarantee Elimelech/Mahlon the right to representation in the
gathering of the town council. In the end Mr. So-and-so will disappear without
a name, but the security of Mahlon’s and Elimelech’s (the dead) names is
guarded.
Again, Boaz closes his speech as he opens it, calling those
around to bear witness. He does this because he wants to remind them of their
responsibility and he also wants them to take that responsibility seriously.
Repetition leads to Retention.
c. RESULT #3: The
Prayer of Blessing-4:11-12
“All the people who were in the court, and the elders, said,
‘We are witnesses…” (4:11a). Interestingly, there is no word for “yes” in the
Hebrew language. In order to affirm something or agree, the Israelites repeated
that which they conceded. Here, they say, “we are witnesses.” By affirming this
role, they agree to the legal and popular obligations that Boaz had gave them
through his speech and state here that they will be the witnesses he has called
them to be concerning this case. However, this is not the end of their input
after the covenant has been made.
With unanimous spontaneity, the crowd (made up of the ten
and the many others who had gathered) erupts in a hymn of blessing that
consists of three parts. First, they express their concern for Boaz by praying that
Ruth be fertile—“ May the Lord make the woman who is coming into your home like
Rachel and Leah, both of whom built the house of Israel” (4:11b). The
expression “who is coming into your home” derives from the ancient customary
practice of the wedding party proceeding to the home of the groom after the
marriage ceremony and him formally ushering the bride into his house.
The crowd
continues and prays that Ruth take her place among the matriarchs of Israel
along with Rachel and Leah. This would have been absolutely unprecedented for
the original readers to see a foreign woman granted such status among Israel’s
finest feminine figures. As is well known, Rachel and Leah were the daughters
of Laban whom Jacob married and who became the founding mothers of the twelve
tribes of Israel. Leah is mentioned second in order for her name to stick in
your mind and draw attention to the tribe of Judah who was associated with
Bethlehem (their present setting) and was a descendant of this famous mother.
Just as Rachel and Leah had built up the house of Israel, so, they pray, may
Ruth build up the house of Boaz.
As the prayer continues, the crowd asks that God all Ruth,
Like Rachel and Leah before her, ”to build a house” (4:11b). This phrase
is an idiom which means “to have progeny, descendants, to establish a family.”
The people’s invocation of Yahweh to make this possible is in keeping with the
psalmist’s notion that “unless the LORD builds a house, they labor in vain who
build it” (Ps. 127:1).
The second blessing the crowd voices was directed to Boaz
and is constructed with two parallel lines.
“May you prosper in Ephrathah
And may a name be called in Bethlehem” (4:11c).
Because of the wide
range of meanings that may be ascribed to hayil
(prosper), this first line is
difficult to pin down. The word can mean “to act valiantly,” “to perform
honorably,” or “to show great strength,” but “to make wealth,” seems to be most
appropriate in the context of a blessing associated with marriage.
Typical of Hebrew
parallelism, the second line builds on the first. The phrase “become famous”
(lit. “to call a name”), means to keep that name alive. It also perceives the
person as living on in his descendants in the place named, which is Bethlehem
here. The ancients believed that when a person’s name is never mentioned after
his death, he ceases to exist.
The third blessing the
witnesses prayed was that Boaz would become like the house of Perez, whom Tamar
bore to Judah—“ Moreover, may your house be like the house of Perez whom Tamar
bore to Judah through the offspring which the Lord will give you by this young
woman” (4:12). This reference to Tamar, Judah, and Perez reinforces the
impression that the narrator has been writing the story of Boaz and Ruth with
Genesis 39 in the back of his mind. What does that say? This most celebrated
example of levirate obligation and betrayal also involved a widow whose
husband, Er, had died without producing
and heir. Failing to get Er’s brother Onan, to
fulfill his levirate obligation and despairing of waiting for Shelah, another
younger brother to grow up, Tamar pretended to be a prostitute and tricked
Judah, her own father-in-law, into a sexual relationship . She conceived and
eventually bore twin sons, Perez and Zerah. Together they became the ancestors
of the tribe of Judah.
The point of comparing Boaz to Judah and Ruth to
Tamar is to draw attention to the common levirate quality to their unions. Through Tamar, whose husband had died
childless, Judah had fathered Perez, who became the ancestor of a host of
clans. Through Ruth, whose husband had died childless, the people prayed that Boaz
might father a child who would birth a multitude as well. However, if one considers
the common rabbinic hermeneutic of arguing from greater to the lesser, the
reader cannot help but think that if Yahweh had given immoral Judah a double
blessing in the birth of twins and if Judah flourished through Perez, how much
greater are the prospects for Boaz and
Ruth. These two have been presented from the beginning to the end as persons
with as people of steadfastness and uprightness.
The people that proclaimed this three-fold
blessing could not have imagined how prophetic it would prove to be.
Collectively inspired by the Spirit of God, they join here in a pronouncement
that will eventually transpire before their very eyes. Had they been around
long enough to see the fulfillment of their prayer, they would have observed
the establishment of a name and a house far greater than Perez.
So What?
We catch a glimpse of this in the rest of Ruth.
So Boaz took Ruth, and
she became his wife, and he went in to her. And the Lord enabled
her to conceive, and she gave birth to a son. Then
the women said to Naomi, “Blessed is the Lord who has not left
you without a redeemer today, and may his name become famous in Israel. May
he also be to you a restorer of life and a sustainer of your old age; for your
daughter-in-law, who loves you and is better to you than seven sons, has
given birth to him.” Then Naomi took the child and
laid him in her lap, and became his nurse. The
neighbor women gave him a name, saying, “A son has been born to Naomi!” So they
named him Obed. He is the father of Jesse, the father of David. (Ruth
4:13-17)
Here in Bethlehem the line of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Judah
is allowed to continue after being thrown into jeopardy because a godly man was
able and willing to redeem a young Moabite woman. Because of his heroism, she gave
birth to a son, and with that, obtained security for her and Naomi’s future.
However, she also is used of God to continue the Messianic line on through David—future
King of Israel—and an even greater figure thereafter—Jesus Christ—who would be
born in the very same small town. This same Jesus, born in Bethlehem, would
redeem lost sinners like you and me. For unto us is born a Redeemer! He loved
us when we were at our worst, lost and helpless, foreign and broken. Have you
entered a relationship with him? Are you living in the joy that comes from
being saved from your former plight?